The Department of Justice relies on several legal roles to keep the San Andreas court system fair, organized, and impartial. Each position has its own authority, responsibilities, and limitations.

---

​

Judges

Judges serve as the presiding authority over court proceedings. Their responsibility is to interpret the law, evaluate the evidence and arguments presented, maintain courtroom order, and ensure both sides receive fair treatment.

---

​

Responsibilities of a Judge

Judges are responsible for:

• Presiding over court proceedings
• Enforcing courtroom procedure
• Reviewing motions and legal filings
• Evaluating evidence and testimony
• Maintaining courtroom order
• Ensuring both parties receive fair treatment
• Issuing lawful orders
• Delivering verdicts and rulings
• Providing written reasoning for significant decisions when appropriate

A Judge’s written reasoning may later be referenced as case law or legal precedent in future proceedings.

---

​

Judicial Limitations

Judges may interpret existing law based on the facts, evidence, arguments, and circumstances of a case. They may not simply ignore, nullify, or disregard existing law because they disagree with it. Judges must also remain neutral when assisting parties with courtroom procedure.

​

A Judge May

• Explain basic court procedure
• Clarify filing requirements
• Control the order of proceedings
• Ask questions necessary to understand the case
• Issue rulings on legal or procedural disputes

​

A Judge May Not

• Build a party’s legal strategy
• Argue a party’s case for them
• Provide one side with unfair legal advice
• Favor a party because of personal relationships or outside influence

---

​

Judicial Corruption

Judges may not participate in corruption, bribery, collusion, favoritism, or improper influence involving a case before them. The integrity of the Judiciary depends on Judges remaining independent from:

• Prosecutors
• Defense attorneys
• Law enforcement
• Defendants
• Witnesses
• Government officials
• Other interested parties

---

​

Contempt of Court

A Judge may hold an individual in Contempt of Court when their conduct disrupts, disrespects, or obstructs a court proceeding. Examples may include:

• Repeatedly interrupting proceedings
• Refusing to follow lawful courtroom instructions
• Disruptive conduct
• Serious disrespect toward the court
• Intentionally obstructing the legal process

Contempt may be classified as either a misdemeanor or felony at the discretion of the presiding Judge and in accordance with applicable law.

---

​

Attorneys

Attorneys represent clients throughout the San Andreas legal system. They may assist with:

• Criminal cases
• Civil cases
• Legal disputes
• Court filings
• Negotiations
• Motions
• Trials and hearings
• Other matters permitted by the Department of Justice

Attorneys are expected to maintain a high standard of professionalism, ethics, and legal competency.

---

​

Bar License

An attorney must hold a valid bar license issued by the Department of Justice before practicing law. Maintaining that license requires continued compliance with applicable DOJ standards.

---

​

Attorney Responsibilities

Attorneys are expected to:

• Provide competent legal counsel
• Protect the lawful interests of their clients
• Review applicable law
• Review relevant evidence
• Prepare legal arguments
• Submit motions and filings
• File evidence and witness lists when required
• Meet applicable deadlines
• Follow courtroom procedure
• Communicate professionally with other parties
• Conduct themselves professionally before the court

---

​

Conflicts of Interest

Attorneys must disclose known conflicts of interest to the Department of Justice or presiding court when applicable. A conflict may arise when an attorney’s:

• Personal interests
• Relationships
• Previous representation
• Financial interests
• Professional obligations
• Other responsibilities

could interfere with their ability to fairly and effectively represent a client. When a conflict exists, the DOJ or presiding Judge may determine whether the attorney may continue participating in the matter.

---

​

Attorney Conduct & Discipline

Attorneys are expected to maintain good professional standing and ethical conduct. Serious misconduct may include:

• Bribery
• Fraudulent legal activity
• Corruption
• Deliberate abuse of legal authority
• Dishonesty before the court
• Other serious professional misconduct

An attorney accused of misconduct may be subject to DOJ disciplinary review. Possible consequences may include:

---

​

Pro Se Defendants

A defendant may request to represent themselves rather than be represented by an attorney. This is known as appearing pro se.

---

​

Requesting Self-Representation

A defendant wishing to represent themselves may petition the court for permission to proceed pro se. The presiding Judge has authority over how representation will be handled. The opposing party may also raise concerns when they believe representation is necessary for the fair or orderly handling of the case. The Judge makes the final procedural determination.

---

​

Pro Se Advisors

A pro se defendant may consult with one additional advisor. However, that advisor does not automatically become the defendant’s attorney for the proceeding. Unless the Judge authorizes otherwise:

• The defendant speaks on their own behalf
• The advisor may assist privately
• The advisor may not independently argue the case
• The advisor remains subject to courtroom rules

---

​

Obtaining an Attorney Later

A pro se defendant may obtain legal representation after initially choosing to represent themselves. However, once a hearing or trial is underway, the Judge may deny or limit a change in representation when allowing it would cause unreasonable disruption or delay.

---

​

Firing or Replacing an Attorney

A defendant may request to dismiss or replace their attorney. The court may consider:

• The stage of the proceeding
• Whether the change would cause unreasonable delay
• Whether another party would be unfairly prejudiced
• Other relevant circumstances

The presiding Judge determines how representation will continue.

---

​

Courtroom Standards Still Apply

Choosing to represent yourself does not exempt you from:

• Filing requirements
• Evidence rules
• Courtroom etiquette
• Deadlines
• Judicial instructions
• Established court procedure

---

​

Court Bailiffs

Court Bailiffs are responsible for maintaining security and order during court proceedings. While court is in session, Bailiffs operate under the authority of the presiding Judge.

---

​

Bailiff Responsibilities

Bailiffs may be responsible for:

• Maintaining courtroom security
• Enforcing access restrictions
• Removing disruptive individuals when ordered by the Judge
• Escorting defendants
• Escorting witnesses
• Escorting jurors when applicable
• Administering oaths to witnesses
• Assisting with the safe and orderly operation of proceedings

---

​

Expert Witnesses

Expert witnesses provide testimony based on specialized knowledge, training, experience, education, or expertise relevant to a case. Unlike an ordinary witness, who generally testifies about what they personally observed or experienced, an expert may help the court understand specialized subject matter.

---

​

Expert Qualification

An individual must be vetted and accepted by the court before being treated as an expert witness. The court may consider factors such as:

• Relevant education
• Training
• Professional experience
• Certifications
• Specialized knowledge
• Experience within the relevant field

Being knowledgeable about a topic does not automatically make a person a court-recognized expert.

---

​

Expert Testimony

Expert testimony should be:

• Relevant
• Factual
• Professional
• Within the witness’s recognized field of expertise
• Helpful to the court’s understanding of the issue

An expert may provide a professional opinion when appropriate. However, an expert should not become an advocate for whichever party called them.

---

​

Role Boundaries at a Glance

When each person stays within the boundaries of their role, the courtroom becomes a place for meaningful legal roleplay instead of confusion over who has authority to do what.